Friday, August 24, 2012

NY State 2012 Ruffed Grouse Drumming Report


During the spring 2012 wild turkey hunting season, DEC conducted the sixth annual Ruffed Grouse Drumming Survey. This survey asks turkey hunters to record the number of grouse they hear drumming while afield. The primary purpose of the survey is to monitor the number of birds drumming per hour (i.e., the drumming rate). Changes in the drumming rate illustrate trends in the grouse population when viewed over time and will provide insight into statewide distributions for this popular game species as habitats change both locally and on a landscape scale.
You can view, print, or download the complete 2012 Ruffed Grouse Drumming Survey Report (PDF) (779 kB).
We thank all the hunters that participated in the Ruffed Grouse Drumming Survey during the 2012 season.

Results from the 2012 Season

During the 2012 season, 157 hunters participated in the Ruffed Grouse Drumming Survey. Survey participants reported data from over 1,000 hunting trips across the state, from the lower Hudson Valley in the south, to the Adirondacks and St. Lawrence Valley in the north, and the Lake Plains and Allegheny Plateau in far western New York. They spent over 3,900 hours afield and observed just over 700 grouse (about 0.20 birds/hour). Some general findings from the 2012 season include:
  • Hunters participating in the survey averaged about 25 hours afield during the 2012 season. They took about 7 trips afield for the season and spent almost 4 hours afield per trip.
  • Survey participants averaged about 4.5 grouse observed per hunter for the 2012 season and had to spend 5 hours afield in order to hear one grouse drumming.
  • Almost half of all survey effort took place during the first week of the season (May 1-7); however, the drumming rate (grouse drumming/hour) was relatively consistent (0.24 birds/hour) for the first two weeks of May.
  • Overall, there was far more effort expended in the southern grouse season zone (about 83% of the total), but the drumming rate was similar between the two zones (0.21 grouse drumming/hour in the northern zone vs. 0.20 grouse drumming/hour in the southern zone).
  • Significantly more effort was expended, and more grouse were observed, on private land than public land; however, public land had a higher drumming rate.
  • Survey effort was distributed across major geographic regions of New York State. About 35% of the effort took place in western New York (14% DEC Region 8, 21% DEC Region 9), about 30% in central New York (DEC Region 7), about 25% in the southeastern portion of the State (8% DEC Regions 3, 17% DEC Region 4), and 11% in northern New York (8% in DEC Region 5 and 3% in Region 6).
  • We observed the highest drumming rate in DEC Region 6 (0.29 grouse drumming/hour), but Region 7 was also above the annual statewide average of 0.20 grouse drumming/hour.
  • The drumming rate was highest in the St. Lawrence Valley Ecozone (0.93 grouse drumming/hour), followed by the Adirondacks-Tug Hill Ecozone (0.25 grouse drumming/hour). The Appalachian Hills & Plateau, Catskills-Delaware Hills, and Champlain Valley ecozones were similar to or slightly above the statewide average.

Comparing 2012 to Previous Seasons

  • Since this survey started in 2007, almost 500 turkey hunters took over 6,400 trips afield and spent almost 25,000 hours recording their grouse observations. Over the past six years, grouse numbers increased, peaked around 2009, and have declined since. Whether this is a result of some cyclical fluctuation or is related to the influence of habitat and weather on nest and brood success is unknown.
  • From 2011 to 2012 the number of survey participants, and the number of trips and hours afield all increased, but the drumming rate declined from 0.25 to 0.20 birds/hour. The amount of time spent afield to hear one grouse drumming increased from 4.7 hours to 5 hours.
  • By almost every measure - total number of grouse drumming, grouse observed/participant, grouse observed/trip, and drumming rate (grouse drumming/hour) - grouse numbers during 2012 were lower than in 2011.
  • Only the Champlain Valley and St. Lawrence Valley ecozones saw an increase in the drumming rate from 2011 to 2012, but it is important to note that due to a small sample size in the St. Lawrence Valley, the results from this ecozone are less reliable than in other regions and the increase was not statistically significant. In fact, survey coverage in much of northern New York is inadequate to reliably estimate drumming rates at the WMU aggregate level (e.g., Tug Hill, Northern Adirondacks). In the future, it will be important to recruit participants in this part of the state to produce an accurate index of grouse abundance there.
  • The drumming rate in the Appalachian Hills and Plateau and Catksills-Delaware Hills ecozones were similar to last year, while the Lake Plains and Mohawk Valley-Hudson Valley-Taconic Highlands ecozones saw declines in the number of grouse drumming/hour from 2011 to 2012.
  • Annual variation in grouse abundance is likely a result of variation in weather, including spring temperature and rainfall and winter snow conditions, and food availability during the summer and fall (e.g., hard and soft mast, insects). Data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service indicate that from April 1 through the end of May 2011, average rainfall was about 3.5 inches above normal statewide, and rainfall was above normal in almost every WMU aggregate in the state, ranging from almost 2 inches above normal in the Hudson valley to 5 inches above normal in the East Appalachian Plateau. This may have negatively affected nest and brood success last year.
  • In areas with a lack of the early successional habitats on which this species depends, grouse, their nests, and young are more vulnerable to predation and other limiting factors, thus we tend to observe lower drumming rates in these areas.

Drumming Survey vs. Grouse Hunting Log and complete NY DEC article

Thursday, August 23, 2012

MN 2012 Initial Pheasant Reports suggest pheasant count may increase slightly from 2011

By Tim Spielman


Minn. — Based on comments and anecdotal reports from the recent DNR roadside counts, it appears officials are optimistic – but probably not overly so – regarding the upcoming fall hunt.

Wendy Krueger, DNR area wildlife manager in Slayton, said pheasant counts this year were better than last year, but not as good as 2010.

During the past few months, the birds have been aided by a mild winter, and, for the most part, a dry spring – over-winter survival was good, as was production this year.

Following a second consecutive harsh winter, last year’s count was down 82 percent from 2010, Krueger said.

“It’s hard to get any lower than that, and it didn’t (in 2012),” she said.

Tabor Hoek, private lands specialist for the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, reports the same.

“Anecdotally, I hear things have improved from last year,” he said.
The state’s conservation officers, some of whom participate in the roadside counts, also have weighed in on the topic, both good and bad.

Read the reports from multiple Conservation Officers

SportDog SD-1850 - Upland Hunter with 2 Collars - For Sale

SOLD



The UplandHunter™ (Model SD-1850) offers a long list of features and benefits that reflect the company’s dedication to living up to its philosophy of providing hunters with “The Gear You’d Design.”

In keeping with the “upland” theme, the compact, ergonomic transmitter is finished in a bold UplandBlaze™ orange. This rugged, waterproof unit offers eight correction levels that are instantly selectable from the intensity dial. Delivering continuous or momentary stimulation is as simple as picking one of the two prominent buttons on the transmitter’s flat front. Both the transmitter and rugged, waterproof collar-receiver operate on rechargeable NiMH batteries. They also offer low-battery notice so a hunter is never caught in the field with an uncharged system. Together they provide up to ¾-mile of range for control of big-running dogs.

The waterproof beeper unit slides onto the collar strap and provides a tracking signal audible from up to 500 yards. The user can turn the beeper on and off or switch beeper run modes by using the transmitter’s side buttons. Run modes include Silent, a beep every five seconds or a beep every 10 seconds. In all modes, the beeper beeps once per second when the dog points. It also offers a choice of nine different tones, adjustable from the transmitter so the hunter can pick the one he can hear the best or finds most pleasant to the ear. The beeper operates on a long-life, user-replaceable lithium battery.

The UplandHunter™ 1850 can be used as a two-dog unit with the purchase of a second collar-receiver/beeper (Model SDR-BEEP). A toggle switch on the transmitter lets the user program the collars individually. Also available is the SD-AB Add-A-Beeper, which is the beeper unit only. The SD-AB can be added to any collar strap and can be operated with other SportDOG Brand® remote transmitters.

Remote Training Features:
3/4-mile range
8 levels of continuous stimulation
8 levels of momentary stimulation
Rechargeable NiMH batteries
Low-battery alert
Expandable to two-dog operation
All components waterproof and submersible

Beeper Features:
Rugged, waterproof speaker unit
Audible to 500 yards
9 tones to choose from
3 run modes (silent, 5-second beep or 10-second beep)
Long-life lithium battery operation
Beeper can be used independently of collar receiver

SportDog SD-1850 Trainer - Collar/Receiver Information:
Internal antenna system
Rugged design
100% Waterproof collar/receiver
Rechargeable NiMH batteries
User-replaceable, NiMH heavy duty batteries which will last 3-5
Built-in LED battery charge indicator and test light
Weight: 9.6 ounces with collar strap
Receiver Dimensions 3" x 1.5" x 1.5"
Collar Dimensions = 1" wide strap, 27" collar strap fits up to 23" dog neck

SportDog SD-1850 Trainer - Transmitter Dimensions:
Weight - 5.6 oz
Measurements - 2.25 " x 1.25 " x 7.5 (with antenna)
100 % waterproof
Durable NiMH batteries
Low battery Indicator
Built-in toggle switch for an easy dog upgrade

SportDog SDR-BEEP Add-A-Collar
Unlike any other product in the category, this remote beeper does not depend on a training collar to operate. You can use your transmitter to operate the remote beeper by itself, the training collar by itself, or both together if you need them. This is a flexible training/hunting accessory that will fit your style. If you own a SportDOG UplandHunter 1850, the 1850 transmitter will operate all SDR-BEEP training collar and beeper functions remotely and allow you to run a second dog. If you own a SportDOG SD-1800, SD-2000, SD-2500, or SD-3000 system, your transmitter, will operate the SDR-BEEP training collar and the remote locate or "call" function on the beeper. SportDOG Brand, Gear the way you'd design it. 

Features:
Original Collar Receiver/Remote Beeper for the UplandHunter SD-1850
Both the Collar Receiver and Remote Beeper are compatible with SportDOG SD-1800, SD-1850, SD-2000, SD-2500 and SD-3000 Remote Transmitters
Modular design allows use of Collar Receiver and Remote Beeper together or separately
Waterproof Collar Receiver and Remote Beeper
Collar Receiver uses replaceable, rechargeable NiMH battery
Beeper uses disposable CR123A battery
SportDOG 2 Year Warranty

Beeper Tones:
Low Volume Hawk
High Volume Hawk
Bobwhite Quail Call
Triple Beep
Low Volume Beep
High Volume Beep
Double High Volume Beep
High Falling to Low Volume
Double High Falling to Low Volume 



Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Briley Choke Tubes For Sale - Beretta and Remington

I'm selling 6 NEW Briley Choke Tubes -  5 Beretta 1 Remington

Check them out on Ebay


In a black oxidized finish. Long shotgun choke tube extends beyond the length of the muzzle, features highly polished interior for less pellet deformation; reduced fliers and tighter patterns. Knurled grasping  band speeds installation and removal. Shotgun choke constriction is marked on band so there is no need to remove shotgun choke to verify size



All Choke Tubes Are New

Beretta Optima Plus - Improved Modified - Extended 



Beretta Optima Plus - Light Full - Extended 



Beretta Optima Plus - Improved Modified - Extended
The Goose Getter Choke is made to bring big, big birds. You can count on it to deliver a lot of punch with the large BB's normally used in Goose hunting. Using this Improved Modified on Geese will deliver every time.


  
Beretta Optima Plus - Full - Extended




Remington - Light Modified - Extended 
The Dove Duster is a choke between Modified and Improved Cylinder, you get the best of both worlds.  Distance is never a problem and when the birds are in close your pattern is open and ready.

Beretta Optima Plus - Skeet - Flush - Silver

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

ND 2012 Pheasant Crowing Counts Up 10%


North Dakota’s spring pheasant crowing count survey revealed a 10 percent increase statewide compared to last year.

All four pheasant districts showed an increase compared to last year. The number of crows heard in the southeast increased by 12 percent, northwest by 8 percent, northeast by 6 percent and southwest by 4 percent.

Stan Kohn, upland game management supervisor for the State Game and Fish Department, said birds did not experience excessive mortality last winter.

“Even with the nice winter last year, I anticipated fewer adult birds to be available this spring because poor production in spring of 2009-11 led to fewer young birds entering the fall population,” Kohn said. “However, I did expect to see higher crow count numbers in the southwest because good numbers of birds were observed last winter, but it didn’t pan out in the crow count numbers.”

Even with a somewhat smaller breeding class of birds, Kohn said hens were in better shape this spring because of less winter stress. In addition, he said nesting habitat looked to be in pretty good condition in all areas of the state, and nesting and brooding weather this spring has been almost ideal.

“I expect much better upland game production this summer,” Kohn added. “Pheasant hens are finding better quality nesting and brooding cover on the uplands this spring, and with the good weather, more hens were successful with first clutches, a positive sign of a good production year.”

However, Kohn noted, the loss of CRP is going to decrease nesting and brooding cover in the future, and will negatively affect the pheasant population.

Spring crowing count data is not always a good indicator of the fall population. It does not measure population density, but provides an index of the spring rooster population based on a trend of number of crows heard. Brood surveys, which begin in mid-July and are completed by September, are a better indicator of the summer’s pheasant production and provide insight into what to expect for a fall pheasant population.

Pheasant crowing counts are conducted each spring throughout North Dakota. Observers drive specified 20-mile routes, stopping at predetermined intervals, and counting the number of pheasant roosters heard crowing over a two-minute period during the stop. The number of pheasant crows heard is compared to previous years’ data, providing a trend summary.

Original ND Game and Fish Article

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Help MN Spend Over $4.5 Million On Habitat Improvement


Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Program

CPL logo - restore, protect, enhance, fish game wildlife habitat
$4,624,000 will be available in FY13 for projects that restore, enhance and/or protect habitats for MN’s fish, game and wildlife.
New this year is the addition of the Expedited Conservation Projects (ECP) grant cycle, for projects under $50,000.  There is a list of eligible restoration and enhancement projects- see the ECP web page for more details.
The traditional Round 1 will open August 15 and close September 26, 2012- see the O25K/ U25K webpage for more details.
Sign up here for the CPL Listserv and be the first to know when new information is available, including application open and close dates, deadline reminders, and award announcements.
See all rounds of funded projects This is a PDF file. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to download it.
CPL users survey results This is a PDF file. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to download it.
Funding for the CPL grant program is from the Outdoor Heritage Fund, created by the people of Minnesota. The CPL Program was recommended by the L-SOHC to (and approved by) the MN Legislature annually since 2009.
The CPL Program has been recommended by the L-SOHC to (and approved by) the MN Legislature from 2009-2011. The MN DNR manages this program to provide competitive grants from $5,000 to $400,000 to local, regional, state, and national nonprofit organizations, including government entities. The grants are for work to enhance, restore, or protect the forests, wetlands, prairies, and habitat for fish, game, or wildlife in Minnesota.
FY2013
For FY2013, there is $4.624 million available for grant projects.  The first round of O25K/ U25K will be open for applicants on August 16, 2012 and close September 26, 2012.  The ECP grant cycle will open on August 16, 2012 and close May 15, 2013.  See the respective grant cycle web pages for program information, including the Request for Proposals (RFP).
FY2012
In FY2012, there was a total of $5.31 million available for to award as grants. Applications for the first round of awards were accepted until September 15, 2011. Of the 31 applications ($2.83 million in requests), 20 projects were funded for a total of $1.8 million. Round 2 yielded 66 applications ($6.3 million in requests), with 38 projects being funded totaling $2.56 million.  Remaining funds will be awarded during FY13 grant rounds.
FY2011
In FY2011, there were 2 rounds of funding. For the first round, 56 applications totaling $5.9 million in requests were received. Of that, 35 applications for a total of $3.72 million were funded. During the second round, 21 applications totaling $1.3 million were received and 13 projects for a total of $630,400 were funded. Click on the FY11 Grant Information link to the left for all current available information on these awarded grants. A total of $4,065,584 was awarded in FY2011.
FY2010
For the first year of the CPL Program, 127 applications totaling $16.5 million in requests were received. Of that, 35 applications for a total of $3.74 million were funded. Click on the FY10 Grant Information link to the left for specific application and summary information. All grant funds were awarded during the fall cycle.
Information for Grant Applicants
Many of the requirements for this grant program are based on recommendations by the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council (LSOHC) to and approved by the Minnesota Legislature. These requirements were incorporated into the DNRs Conservation Partners Grant Program Accomplishment Plan as approved by the LSOHC. Links to all years of legislation and Accomplishment Plans are provided below.
For more information contact:
Email: LSCPLGrants.DNR@state.mn.us
Phone:
Sam Fleitman,  CPL Grants Coordinator
651-259-5233
Jamie Gangaware, Conservation Resource Specialist
651-259-5174 (St. Paul)
Mailing Address:
Conservation Partners Legacy Grant
MN DNR
500 Lafayette Road
Box #20
St. Paul, MN 55155
Related DNR Programs:

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

English Setter Excellence with Dave Hughes - Grouse Woodcock - Video


English Setter grouse dog excellence is demonstrated by pro-trainer Dave Hughes and Long Gone Kennel owner Lloyd Murray and filmed by Bird Dogs Afield.